Re: Inclusion of sendmail and patch

Dan Kegel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lee W wrote:
> After reading Matts post I am a little clearer as to why its included.  From
> my experience with other distros I know that a lot of them have scripts that
> depend on having sendmail-like program installed, which I can see could be
> enough of a reason to make it part of the standard.
> 
> However as I said before, regardless of this fact as I understand it the
> majority of sendlike-programs (excluding the orignal sendmail) are required
> to run daemon processes (I have looked into postfix, qmail & exim and
> believe this is how them run) in order to deliver mail.

To make all programs happy, your sendmail replacement probably
has to do the following:

* let you send mail by running the program /usr/lib/sendmail
* let you send mail by connecting to localhost smtp port.
   This means you need a daemon of some sort.
   Not sure if LSB requires this, but some programs do expect it.
* reliably send mail even if the smarthost is down.  This
   means you either need a daemon or a crontab job to send
   queued messages.  (Sendmail uses a crontab job.)

You seem to have some fear of daemons.  Don't.  Normal desktop
machines have lots of 'em.  They're your friends.
- Dan


-- 
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.