Re: Inclusion of sendmail and patch
Dan Kegel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lee W wrote: > After reading Matts post I am a little clearer as to why its included. From > my experience with other distros I know that a lot of them have scripts that > depend on having sendmail-like program installed, which I can see could be > enough of a reason to make it part of the standard. > > However as I said before, regardless of this fact as I understand it the > majority of sendlike-programs (excluding the orignal sendmail) are required > to run daemon processes (I have looked into postfix, qmail & exim and > believe this is how them run) in order to deliver mail. To make all programs happy, your sendmail replacement probably has to do the following: * let you send mail by running the program /usr/lib/sendmail * let you send mail by connecting to localhost smtp port. This means you need a daemon of some sort. Not sure if LSB requires this, but some programs do expect it. * reliably send mail even if the smarthost is down. This means you either need a daemon or a crontab job to send queued messages. (Sendmail uses a crontab job.) You seem to have some fear of daemons. Don't. Normal desktop machines have lots of 'em. They're your friends. - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045