Re: [email list for PACKAGING has been created.

Mike Hearn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Are the LSB mailing lists recovered yet? Messages I've sent to
lsb-discuss at any rate have failed to get through :(

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 20:24, George Kraft wrote:
> As promised, the lsb-taskforce2 email list has been retired, and we have
> created "[email protected]" to restart the packaging
> discussions.
> 
> Anyone wanting to join and participate in the packaging discussions
> should read up on the previous work before making any posts.
> 
> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/faq/
> 
> George (gk4)
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> From: George Kraft <[email protected]>
> To: Anthony W. Youngman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mike Hearn <[email protected]>, Dan Kegel <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Scott McNeil <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Michael Chase-Salerno <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] Some questions on the LSB build environment
> Date: 11 Feb 2003 16:05:07 -0600
> 
> > It wasn't one of mine either. The problem is that doesn't fit well with
> > the LSB, which is to codify existing practices.
> 
> Packaging is an exception to the rule, because the current inconsistent
> solutions cannot meet the growing demands (ie., dependency chain,
> content management: package updates and roll backs).
> 
> The LSB had established a Least Common Denominator (LCD) taskforce to
> describe what was common between RPM and DEB, and to establish a set of
> requirements.
> 
> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/faq/
> 
> After the LCD phase, then the Unified Packaging taskforce was to add
> enhancements to Linux packaging.
> 
> The final phase was to define a new dependency chain.
> 
> http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/draft.txt
> 
> Recently at an LSB meeting in New York city, the workgroup had discussed
> the possibility of defining a new XML packaging DTD.  This could reflect
> the designs outlined in the above mentioned taskforces.
> 
> The current plan is to restart the packaging team by briefly reviewing
> what had been done, re-outline the requirements and goals, then map out
> a plan.  The first action item is to create a new email list called
> [email protected]; however, this will have to wait until the
> end of the month because we are reorganizing the LSB and FSG servers.
> 
> George (gk4)
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.