Re: [email list for PACKAGING has been created.
Mike Hearn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Are the LSB mailing lists recovered yet? Messages I've sent to lsb-discuss at any rate have failed to get through :( On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 20:24, George Kraft wrote: > As promised, the lsb-taskforce2 email list has been retired, and we have > created "[email protected]" to restart the packaging > discussions. > > Anyone wanting to join and participate in the packaging discussions > should read up on the previous work before making any posts. > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/faq/ > > George (gk4) > > -----Forwarded Message----- > > From: George Kraft <[email protected]> > To: Anthony W. Youngman <[email protected]> > Cc: Mike Hearn <[email protected]>, Dan Kegel <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Scott McNeil <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Michael Chase-Salerno <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] Some questions on the LSB build environment > Date: 11 Feb 2003 16:05:07 -0600 > > > It wasn't one of mine either. The problem is that doesn't fit well with > > the LSB, which is to codify existing practices. > > Packaging is an exception to the rule, because the current inconsistent > solutions cannot meet the growing demands (ie., dependency chain, > content management: package updates and roll backs). > > The LSB had established a Least Common Denominator (LCD) taskforce to > describe what was common between RPM and DEB, and to establish a set of > requirements. > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/faq/ > > After the LCD phase, then the Unified Packaging taskforce was to add > enhancements to Linux packaging. > > The final phase was to define a new dependency chain. > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/packaging/lcd/draft.txt > > Recently at an LSB meeting in New York city, the workgroup had discussed > the possibility of defining a new XML packaging DTD. This could reflect > the designs outlined in the above mentioned taskforces. > > The current plan is to restart the packaging team by briefly reviewing > what had been done, re-outline the requirements and goals, then map out > a plan. The first action item is to create a new email list called > [email protected]; however, this will have to wait until the > end of the month because we are reorganizing the LSB and FSG servers. > > George (gk4) > > >