Re: Packaging group
Mike Hearn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I am a debian developer, however my opinions are my own, i do not > represent the debian project in any official capacity. What we really need are the people who work on the apt/packaging infrastructure side of things from debian. Do you know who they are/could you get in touch with them? > What happened to the group that was going to investigate a new packaging > system, is that idea dead ? No, it's barely even born yet. The fact is though it makes more sense IMHO to transition first to a state where multiple packaging systems can peacefully co-exist, and then create a new packaging format. We might as well improve the current situation before diving in and inventing new file formats, as really that's only one small component of the problem. > I strongly believe packaging is all about metadata, i consider it to be > specialist database. There are lots of issues. Not just the packages themselves, you've got the networks, binary portability, relocatability etc etc I think a good start would be aim towards allowing the current lowest-common-denominator LSB packages to be a bit less lowest-common-denominator, and have dependancies, after all managing deps is one of the biggest advantages of package management in the first place. That involves solving quite a few other problems along the way, but that's OK because we'd have had to solve them anyway even if we were starting with a new format. thanks -mike