| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Nils O. [ISO-8859-1] Selåsdal wrote:
> >If things are missing form the LSB development headers,
> The headers seems to conform to the LSB written specification 1.3 , but
> what I'm wondering about is how to _use_ them, when things are "missing"
> with respect to what is defined in the "standard" glibc (and Solaris)
> headers.
If something important is missing, then it is a bug. We have found a number of
issues with the development environment since 1.3. These are reflected in the
daily snapshots that are available on the ftp site.
> E.g. shouldn't I atleast be able to compile output made by rpcgen ?
> If I cannot, I'm afraid I'm lost..
Yes, you should. If you can provide a small exmaple, then we can get things
fixed.
Stuart
[email protected] Free Standards Group
Lead Developer, Written Specification Linux Standard Base
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149