| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Nils O. [ISO-8859-1] Selåsdal wrote:
> Ok. It's not always easy for me to determin what should/should not be
> part of LSB, what's missing from lsbdev-base and so on.
The specification can be found at http://ww.linuxbase.org/spec/ It has an
appendix that is just a list of all of the interfaces. This is a good place to
quickly look to see if an interface is included or not.
If an interface is included, then all associated structures and constant
values should also be included.
> lockf is defined as extern void lockf(void);
> changing that to
> int lockf(int fd, int cmd, off_t len);
> makes it work.
Sigh.. I'm not too suprised. If we missed the flag values, then missing the
function signature also would be likely. Thanks for finding these for us.
Stuart
[email protected] Free Standards Group
Lead Developer, Written Specification Linux Standard Base
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149