Re: Init script $named boot facility

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> [email protected] ([email protected]) said: 
> 
>>On Tue, 20 May 2003, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That is what I figured.  Is there a way to get an official clarification of this
>>>either added to future versions of the LSB, and/or part of the LSB errata (or
>>>other official source?)  This has definatly led to some confusion for us.  :)
>>
>>Yes there is. Please file a bug on this using the sourceforge bug tracker.
>>This way, it gets run through the process, and won't get dropped.
> 
> 
> Some of this was in theory handled as of:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=506828&group_id=1107&atid=101107
> 

That bug definatly cleared up part of the issue, but I believe that $named was 
ignored.  I created a new defect, number 740760 that addresses the $named issue. 
  I was sure to put a reference to the defect 506828.

Thank you all for your help!
--Mark