Re: PROPOSAL: /opt/<provider>/<package>/]

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:51:24AM -0600, Bart Whiteley wrote:
> Also, I would prefer that configuration data be allowed to 
> be in /etc/opt/<provider>/<something>, where <something>
> does not necessarily correspond to a "package".  Similar 
> arguments apply here.  Perhaps there are some configuration
> files that are used by a lot of "packages".  

Why not a configuration package?
 
> This fourth rule covers init and cron scripts, as well as other 
> things not currently covered in the specification (like 
> /etc/logrotate.d/<provider>-*).

I think logrotate should be patched to use /etc/opt/logrotate.d/ also
if it exists.  And ofcourse the same for cron and init.


Just thought,

Gerhard.