Re: Re: PROPOSAL: /opt/<provider>/<package>/]

All,

I am not an 'official' participant here, just an interested party.

But.....
> 
> Maybe it would be helpful if someone would explain to me 
> why /opt/<provider>/<package> is superior to 
> /opt/<provider>/<what ever the provider feels is appropriate>. 
> 
> As long as things are under /opt/<provider>, namespace collisions
> are avoided.  What more does /opt/<provider>/<package> buy?

This: /opt/<provider>/<what ever the provider feels is appropriate>.
Makes complete sense to me. Leave it up to the provider to keep it
clean.

My 2 cents....thanks. :-)

-- 
Tim Cook, President
Open Paradigms,LLC
731.884.4126
http://www.openparadigms.com