Re: [lsb-futures] Re: Configuration File Spec part of LSB?
Matt Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:44:58PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > The second observation I would make is that given the merger of SuSE, > Turbo Linux, Caldera, etc. into the United Linux distribution, if > you're right that SuSE is already using the rc.config.d system here > are some things that could be done to popularize it. > > 1) Try to convince Red Hat to adopt this scheme. > > 2) Try to convince Debian to adopt this scheme. (Be prepared for > nasty politics.) > > 3) Suggest that this directory be documented in the Filesystem > Hierarchy Standard. It is safe to say that more distributions are using an /etc/sysconfig scheme than anything else. In SuSE Linux 8.0 there is an /etc/sysconfig directory, but the file contents don't match the other /etc/sysconfig-using distros. Cheers, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [email protected]