Re: [lsb-futures] Re: Configuration File Spec part of LSB?

Matt Wilson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:44:58PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 
> The second observation I would make is that given the merger of SuSE,
> Turbo Linux, Caldera, etc. into the United Linux distribution, if
> you're right that SuSE is already using the rc.config.d system here
> are some things that could be done to popularize it.
> 
> 1)  Try to convince Red Hat to adopt this scheme.
> 
> 2)  Try to convince Debian to adopt this scheme.  (Be prepared for
> nasty politics.)
> 
> 3) Suggest that this directory be documented in the Filesystem
> Hierarchy Standard.

It is safe to say that more distributions are using an /etc/sysconfig
scheme than anything else.  In SuSE Linux 8.0 there is an
/etc/sysconfig directory, but the file contents don't match the other
/etc/sysconfig-using distros.

Cheers,

Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.