Re: LSB 2.0 and NPTL

It looks like we have some vsth-lite (pthreads) test setup issues;
however, the LSB's intent has always been to specify true POSIX Threads
once it's implemented in the kernel and libpthreads.

http://freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-test/2003-July/001731.html

http://freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-test/2003-July/001738.html

We will need to fix our tests and tweak the LSB 2.0 specification by Oct
17th.

George (gk4)

On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:18, Darrin Thompson wrote:
> Will any of the planned LSB 2.0 modules require NPTL for compliance? I'm 
> hoping for both the binary and the long format answer.
> 
> -- 
> Darrin Thompson
> Progeny
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-discuss
-- 
George (gk4)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/VfwCwvzgdOMj/pARAqzhAKC23DcpA/WEMeA/lP5Qhzz9FzJaHACgltk1
n2XDPXy6DyFqbhDiixitIKA=
=i1dP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----