Re: LSB 2.0 and NPTL
George Kraft <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM |
| Message-ID | <1062613884.1788.121.camel@gkraft4> |
> You say "We will need to fix..." Does that mean you intend to insist on > NPTL? Insist on "POSIX Threads" as described in SUSv3 which is implemented by NPTL. NPTL should not be directly referenced. -- George (gk4)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/VjN8wvzgdOMj/pARAqJhAJ4iFf/fuyt5Iq29OPG7CjZ2XPVj3wCgk+zc WQkDj2YYxLDqc/MhHI6YwhU= =RAx6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----