Re: PROPOSAL: requiring applications to be provided in RPM packaging format

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, George Kraft wrote:

> http://www.linuxbase.org/~gk4/requires-lsb-proposal.html

Should 3b be "completely passes lsbappchk, but has ......" ?


                                Stuart

[email protected]                             Free Standards Group
Lead Developer, Written Specification                  Linux Standard Base
1024D/37A79149:                                        0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                       BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.