Re: PROPOSAL: requiring applications to be provided in RPM packaging format
George Kraft <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM |
| Message-ID | <1064928294.2235.74.camel@gkraft4> |
As a followup to my earlier posting regarding RPM file format. The LSB Specification Authority has been working on rewording the requirements. Here is the new wording that has just been drafted. "Applications shall either be packaged in the RPM packaging format as defined in this specification, or supply an installer which is LSB conforming (for example, calls LSB ABIs and commands)." "Distributions shall provide a mechanism for installing applications in this (RPM) packaging format with some restrictions listed below." http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/swinstall.html -- George (gk4)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/eYQmwvzgdOMj/pARAooJAJ4s3GOwoVsOQch6EYnUIML/wQUGLACfTIF3 jWZuFDZRMmBwDCvhmy3cvpY= =4wWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----