Re: install_initd behavior for non-LSB init scripts.
Thorsten Kukuk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, Germany |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Oct 17, Bart Whiteley wrote:
> Could the LSB spec be changed to state that
> install_initd should not be allowed to do anything
> to scripts that don't have "{BEGIN,END} INIT INFO"
> comments?
This has nothing to do with LSB, this is distribution
specific. The LSB defines the handling of LSB conform
scripts, not the handling of non-LSB conform scripts.
The distributions are free to do what they wish with non
conform scripts, since LSB does not describe how to handle
distribution specific scripts and LSB does not describe how
distributions should handle their init scripts.
> What is the point of moving all of these scripts
> to S01... ? What's wrong with leaving them at the
> numbers that a %post script may have set them
> to through means other than install_initd?
The script will only be moved, if the script before and/or
after this script will be renumberd. If the scripts before and
after this script will be renumberd, your selected fix
number is wrong and it doesn't matter where it will be moved
too, it is always wrong.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ [email protected]
SuSE Linux AG Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B