Re: plugins
Darrin Thompson <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:00:01 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > Just wanted to bring out a topic that was raised to > me by an ISV at Linux World. > > What does it mean for a plugin (e.g., a > web browser plugin) to be LSB conforming? > > Does it only make sense in the context of > an LSB conforming application, or does it > make sense (minus FHS considerations, > I suppose, since the plugin needs to be located > where the appliction can find it) with a > non-LSB application? > My $0.02: I think it makes little sense for an lsb-application to have lsb-conforming plugins. For instance, if Maya were packaged as and lsb-app, plugins for Maya would only be concerned with Maya, not with LSB. I think it makes a lot of sense to have lsb-plugins for components (modules?) of an lsb-runtime. (Mozilla?) Darrin