LSB 2.0 review questions
"Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:12:21 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | OSDL |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[apologies if you see this twice; i thought i was subscribed the first time] Hi, I have a few questions. I'll be glad to put these into the bugzilla if that's appropriate for some of them. 1. in LSB-Core, Foreword: http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/overview.html and LSB-Embedded, Foreword: http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Embedded/LSB-Embedded/overview.html "ELF" is used but not defined AFAICT. Is this Executable and Linking Format or something else? (note 1: LSB-Graphics does not say "ELF" here.) (note 2: Ch. 7 defines ELF as Executable and Linking Format.) 2. same as above for Ch. 3, Requirements: http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Core/LSB-Core/requirements.html and http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Embedded/LSB-Embedded/requirements.html 3. Is there any high-level summary of differences between Core, Embedded, Graphics, etc.? 4. You've probably heard this one a few times: "gLSB: The common part of the LSB Specification that describes those parts of the interface that remain constant across all hardware implementations of the LSB." This seems not to be used as a common part of the spec. for the different usage models (what are they called?), those being Generic, Core, and Embedded. Why are large parts of the spec. repeated for the usage models? Do you expect them to diverge in the future? 9. meta-comment: The HTML presentation (display) would be much more readable if it were in 2 columns, or it just didn't use the entire width of the screen. Thanks, -- ~Randy