RE: EDA consortium roadmap.

> Looking at http://www.edac.org/resources_roadmap.jsp, I see a 
> lot of RHEL, but no LSB. 
> 
> It would make sense for these ISVs to snap to LSB, instead of 
> something propietary like RHEL. 
> 
> Does the EDA consortium know about LSB?

I doubt whether it's on their radar.  You care to help
change that?  At a brief glance, it looked like this
was based more on OS Support than anything else, and
of course LSB still needs to be provided by some OS
vendor, which they appear to have chosen.