Re: RE: [Lsb-desktop] KDE representation
"Christopher Yeoh" <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:41:18 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Rajesh, At 2005/8/9 11:26-0700 Banginwar, Rajesh writes: > Hi Olaf, > Yes, restarting the toolkit wars or dividing the community is > the last thing LSB wants to do. > > Let me try to summarize our discussion in yesterday's plenary session: > There are few options we can consider: > 1. Trolltech changing their licensing > 2. LSB changing their licensing criteria > 3. All Qt applications to link statically if interested to get LSB > certification. I know this was brought up in previous LSB meetings, but I was wondering if the concept of having a "GPL" module for libraries like Qt was considered at the plenary. This would allow the LSB to provide standards for Qt based applications but at the same time make it clear to application writers what their obligations would be (eg either be GPL'd or in the case of Qt have the possiblity of paying Trolltech). Chris -- [email protected] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia