RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:45:16 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.discuss
Message-ID <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D08747681@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com>
>>May be I am missing something here, the app will work on any LSB
>>certified distro since library B and C will provide the ABI=20
>>required for
>>the App. The ABI coming from lib D will be taken care of by the
>>application developer himself by distributing the library.=20
>>
>>The application will have to do this only for the libraries=20
>not covered
>>by LSB, of course.
>
>Maybe I'm missing something this time, but that's the situation
>that exists today, so what would be the change?

Okay, I was - the idea that those shlibs didn't have to be
built lsb-conforming.  I know there are people who want to
do this, but don't see how it can work as things are today.