RE: [lsb-futures] Re: [Lsb-desktop] Re: KDE representation
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:45:16 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D08747681@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com> |
>>May be I am missing something here, the app will work on any LSB >>certified distro since library B and C will provide the ABI=20 >>required for >>the App. The ABI coming from lib D will be taken care of by the >>application developer himself by distributing the library.=20 >> >>The application will have to do this only for the libraries=20 >not covered >>by LSB, of course. > >Maybe I'm missing something this time, but that's the situation >that exists today, so what would be the change? Okay, I was - the idea that those shlibs didn't have to be built lsb-conforming. I know there are people who want to do this, but don't see how it can work as things are today.