RE: Future work
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:17:45 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.implementation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > NOTE: we suspect that the same consideration > > applies to AMD64 - namely that an essentially > > 32-bit distribution with 64-bit libraries added > > on top is an adequate solution. The lsbsi is > > not proposed to contain 64-bit binaries, but to > > be able to run them, including the LSB runtime > > test suite and the application battery. Can > > someone with AMD64 knowledge confirm or deny > > that this approach would work? > > You could do the same as on PowerPC64 but this is not how we do it at > SuSE. > > AMD64 is a real 64-bit systems with additionally 32-bit libraries to > support execution of x86 binaries. So you have a full 64-bit userland > including binaries. Okay, that's why the question was asked! Would you suggest building AMD64's lsbsi the way you do, 64-bit with 32-bit libs? Once the concept it set up it wouldn't be to hard to do it either way, I don't think. -- mats