lsbsi 2.0 issues

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:37:27 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.implementation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Brief discussion today. 

What's needed for lsbsi 2.0?  Besides
adding dual-architecture support,
uplifiting some of the packages.
The biggest would seem to be glibc-2.3.
Will also have to switch to coreutils
to keep pace.  Coreutils is a bit of
a pain to capture all of the exceptions
(don't install this file) from the
xml for the three packages that have now
become coreutils; might be worth reviving
a hack to the python version of cmdchk
which did the opposite check: what's
there that shouldn't be (cmdchk.py is
in the cvs but the hack is not).  We
might like to have that report for the
lsbsi anyway.

To be evolved further.