Re: lsb-si 2.0
George Kraft <[email protected]> 27 Aug 2003 12:19:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.implementation |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM |
| Message-ID | <1062004746.2861.146.camel@gkraft4> |
> glibc 2.2.5 2.3.2 what about NPTL? If it is feasible for the LSB for 2.0 to include NPTL, then we should do it. -- George (gk4)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/TOgKwvzgdOMj/pARAgfAAJ0Sdwxx1EGJ5IgEdWnz3oGrwPJ3RQCfRqXx gtrj+pC0cW97pViKMUce6o0= =nr5f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----