Re: [Lsb-test] runtime test: diffs base system vs. lsbsi

At 2004/4/28 16:39-0700  Wichmann, Mats D writes:
> 
> Besides that there are twelve regressions (and three
> improvements!).  This was the actual purpose of the
> exercise....Of those, two are FHS failures looking
> in /lib, where a 64-bit lsbsi does not put a dynamic
> linker or C library.  This test needs to be variable
> depending on the platform.

Hi Mats,

If you haven't already done so, could you please make sure you enter
bug reports for these?

Thanks,

Chris
-- 
[email protected]
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia