glibc version in lsbsi (was: More runtime 2.0.2 / lsbsi investigation)
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 May 2004 15:03:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.implementation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D04C90F37__18124.9147085056$1083622076@fmsmsx404.fm.intel.com> |
Sample implemtentation test results reported earlier: > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf/T.sysconf 8 FAIL > 200|474 8 07:58:17|TP Start > 520|474 8 00007908 1 1|sysconf(_SC_VERSION) failed expected > 200112, got 199506 > 220|474 8 1 07:58:17|FAIL > > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf_X/T.sysconf_X 11 FAIL > /tset/POSIX.os/procenv/sysconf_X/T.sysconf_X 13 FAIL > These two have identical failures: > 520|475 11 00007909 1 1|sysconf(_SC_2_VERSION) failed > expected 200112 - got 199209 > 220|475 11 1 07:58:18|FAIL These of course are related to glibc... the change to go to 200112 across the board for all the POSIX sysconf values happened a long time ago (several were changed earlier), but six months after glibc 2.3.2 was tagged for release, and we're using the released 2.3.2 tarballs. I guess I'm still trying to figure out what the sample implementation should use as the basis for glibc - there doesn't seem to be a cvs tag later than 2.3.2 and no new tarballs, but all the distros are currently using something later than this. Generally we try to stick to the latest released tarballs but somebody said the glibc project wasn't releasing tarballs any longer ??? Is that correct ??? Mats