Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]  
 
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla   
bugsystem (http://bugs.linuxbase.org/) that require  
attention.  
  
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched  
in 7 days or more.  You need to take a look at them, and   
decide on an initial action.  
  
Generally, this means one of three things:  
  
(1) You decide this bug is really quick to deal with (like, it's INVALID),  
    and so you get rid of it immediately.  
(2) You decide the bug doesn't belong to you, and you reassign it to someone  
    else.  (Hint: if you don't know who to reassign it to, make sure that  
    the Component field seems reasonable, and then use the "Reassign bug to  
    owner of selected component" option.)  
(3) You decide the bug belongs to you, but you can't solve it this moment.  
    Just use the "Accept bug" command.  
  
To get a list of all NEW bugs, you can use this URL (bookmark it if you  
like!):  
  
   http://bugs.linuxbase.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&[email protected]  
  
Or, you can use the general query page, at  
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/query.cgi.  
  
Appended below are the individual URLs to get to all of your NEW bugs that  
haven't been touched for a week or more.  
  
You will get this message once a day until you've dealt with these bugs!    /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd vs install_initd in path
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43
  Package naming requirements appears inappropriate for ISVs
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77
  LSB needs a reliable architecture identifier
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
  package naming rules still confusing/restrictive
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147
  name conflicts in /opt
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154
  packaging book needs description for non-RPM packages
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327
  Does non-conformant link(2) need to be documented?
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367
  ELF Additional Special Sections undefined
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370
  RTLD_DEFAULT flag needs to be added to the spec.
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375
  Additional Behaviors section needs something for EDEADLK tests and a few others
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403
  Should specify posix_openpt
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430
  Are you using FDL v1.1 or v1.2?
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541
  problem w/ init script stuff
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662
  lsb dynamic linker increment to so.3 for lsb 3.0
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690
  what is the name of the _lsb_ package
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692
  Add gtk base libraries
    -> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705