RE: LSB System Initialization chapter

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.specification
Message-ID <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D07A2130F@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com>
As a followup, based on favorable feedback from
a few reviewers, the below changes are reflected in
Preview2.  Tobias had raised a change in behavior
in one area (the init functions), but that regression
was present in the Preview1 wording that I started
from, so I left it that way and filed a bug on it
and we'll make sure to fix it for the release candidate.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>Wichmann, Mats D
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:47 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: [lsb-spec] LSB System Initialization chapter
>
>
>I've been continually frustrated by how hard
>it is to get the sysinit chapter right through
>the repeated small tweaks we've been doing
>over the months.  Further, I've started looking
>again at how to write a sample implementation of
>this stuff (required for the lsbsi, been missing
>way too long), and found it not really clear to
>implement to.
>
>So I took a while to do a major cleanup. The
>sections are now consistent with one another,
>and have cross-references so the reader should
>easily see the relationships of the pieces.
>I don't think I changed the meaning of anything,
>but since so much changed, I've just popped
>a copy here for a look:
>
>http://www.linuxbase.org/~mats/sysinit/tocsysinit.html
>
>This is a "proposed change", I haven't checked this in.
>
>Note as you follow the links, only the sysinit
>chapter is there, the other links will be broken.
>
>Along the way I filed several bugs for clarification,
>there's still some information that is not quite
>sorted out in those:
>http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=818
>http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=819
>http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821
>and also interesting might be
>http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823
>
>Any comments?
>
>-- mats
>
>_______________________________________________
>lsb-spec mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-spec
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.