Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
[email protected] Mon, 04 Jul 2005 01:00:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.specification |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.linuxbase.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and
decide on an initial action.
Generally, this means one of three things:
(1) You decide this bug is really quick to deal with (like, it's INVALID),
and so you get rid of it immediately.
(2) You decide the bug doesn't belong to you, and you reassign it to someone
else. (Hint: if you don't know who to reassign it to, make sure that
the Component field seems reasonable, and then use the "Reassign bug to
owner of selected component" option.)
(3) You decide the bug belongs to you, but you can't solve it this moment.
Just use the "Accept bug" command.
To get a list of all NEW bugs, you can use this URL (bookmark it if you
like!):
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&[email protected]
Or, you can use the general query page, at
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/query.cgi.
Appended below are the individual URLs to get to all of your NEW bugs that
haven't been touched for a week or more.
You will get this message once a day until you've dealt with these bugs! Release LSB 2.2
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770
ISO Comment: __libc_start_main does
not appear to be properly documented.
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=865
No packaging information on rpm specfile feature %config
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=876
.gnu_debuglink section
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=892
cron job specification is noit tight enough
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=894
Script Naming conventions are inadequate
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=896
Futures request -- ARM
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909
AMD64 should be replaced with x86-64
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936
libgcc_s generic wording deceptive
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=950
Standard lacks guidelines for group ID ranges
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=961
LSDA for C++ needs to be described.
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=995