Re: cvs tagging for 3.0

The refspecs stuff should now be in place, with a tag of LSB_3_0_0.

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 20:28, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> Now that we've got a final build of 3.0 we need to
> tag the tree.  I'm sure we actually have a policy
> but with several people responsible for several
> different parts of the tree (spec/runtime-test/tools)
> it would be really good to be sure that we uniformly
> tag the cvs tree as the various part release.  
> Except for test, which I haven't looked at, I know
> we did this right for 2.x, because I'm able to check
> out a 2.x branch with a single tag.
> 
> Who's doing the tagging, and what's the tag going
> to be? (note Andrew already tagged the runtime-test
> tree, so we may have somethig to follow).
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-spec mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-spec