RE: lsbpkgchk results for lsb-tet3-lite package
Stuart Anderson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> There are a couple of issues here, neither of them major.
> I'm not sure if we ought to be making them journal file
> failures. Stuart, what do you think?
>
>> Incorrect RPMTAG_ARCH: expecting i486 but found i386
This one should be a failur in the journal.
> The LSB does allow 486-level instructions, and we normally
> build packages to the 486 level. There's recently even
> been some comment (from Alan Cox, if I recall - did someone
> capture those?) that we ought to lift it a bit higher.
The LSB-IA32 actually specifies i486 instruction set.
>
>> Didn't see expected dependency lsb-core-ia32: 3.0
>
> We do think this is required. I see you've commented
> it out in your specfile with a note that it often
> prevents packages from installing. It's bit of a pain
> for development where we're trying to install in advance
> of official distro support (need to either use our
> informal lsb-dummy, or install with --nodeps if that
> is the case), but it IS something that needs to be in
> place for an LSB-conforming package.
Agreed.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [email protected]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149