[Bug 987] New: pam account setup uses non-LSB command

In fact, we need chage for both vsx1 and vsx2:

chage -m 1 -M 2 -d $yr-$month-$date vsx1;
chage -E $yr-$month-$date vsx2

we can use usermod (which conforms to LSB) to replace chage for vsx2, but
it has no such features as -m, -M and -d options of chage.

Any thoughts?

Regards.
Rui Feng

Forwarding...
2005年6月9日 13:04
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], Rui Feng/China/IBM@IBMCN
From: Rui Feng/China/IBM@IBMCN
Subject: [Lsb-test] [Bug 987] New: pam account setup uses non-LSB command


Hi Mats,

Should we include chage into LSB spec? Or is there another way to achieve
the
same function using LSB conforming comands? I cannot find it.

Regards.
Rui Feng

Forwarding...
2005年6月9日 0:01
To: [email protected]
cc:
From: [email protected]
Subject: [Lsb-test] [Bug 987] New: pam account setup uses non-LSB command



OtherBugsDependingO 612
nThis:


The pam runtime_config.sh script which performs account setup is actually
using
a command not required by the LSB to do this work: chage.  This means a
conforming system could fail to perform this setup, and end up failing a
bunch
of pam tests.

--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.linuxbase.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

_______________________________________________
lsb-test mailing list
[email protected]
 http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test

_______________________________________________
lsb-test mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test