RE: expected test counts

Rui Feng <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite
Message-ID <OFE75B5EFD.72F00EE6-ON48257022.00096B40-48257022.000964D1@cn.ibm.com>
Hi,

lsb-c++ should be 1406, v3_abi_test has been removed.

Regards!
Rui Feng

[email protected] wrote on 2005-06-15 23:15:06:

> cmdchk should be 133.  the current snapshot is
> adding a line for this - it actually internally
> counts the number of commands in the generated table.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected]
> >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> >Andrew Josey
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 6:19 AM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [Lsb-test] expected test counts
> >
> >hi
> >I'm trying to calculate expected test counts (primarily
> >in the runtime where these can be fixed).
> >
> >So far i see
> >
> >lsb-runtime-test 3.0.0-3  9859
> >lsb-c++ (qmtest/..)  1407
> >lsb-vsw4  3928
> >lsbcmdchk  134
> >
> >I'd like to confirm these.
> >regards
> >Andrew
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >lsb-test mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-test mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test

_______________________________________________
lsb-test mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.