RE: [Lsb-wg] install_initd test scripts written
"McFadden, Gordon" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9A40B203D9AEE64B9BEC382D7F314D3806EA5741@fmsmsx407.amr.corp.intel.com> |
Andrew, I changed the asserts based on you comments as far as possible. Gord -- Gordon McFadden System Architect Channel Software Operation Intel Corporation ph: +1 503 264 4309 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Josey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:06 AM To: McFadden, Gordon; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lsb-wg] install_initd test scripts written Gordon I did not see any written response to the comments on the assertions On a brief look at some of what you checked in, tet_xres is a results file and should not be in the source code. I'll see if I have time to look at the code drop, but have to wonder if its worth making any comments, based on lack of feedback to date:-( regards Andrew On Jun 16, 2:38pm in "[Lsb-wg] install_ini", McFadden, Gordon wrote: > > > Folks, > > I have completed the test scripts for the install_initd and > remove_initd. > > The scripts match the ASSERTs whish I updated after comments. > The ASSERTs and scripts are under the lsb-runtime-tests/wip/initd > directory. > > There are some open questions, especially around behavior where a > dependency > In packages exists. > > It would be great if these scripts could be run on a bunch of different > distros and architectures and the results examined (by me) to see if we > have everything correct. > > > Thanks > > Gord > > > > -- > Gordon McFadden > System Architect > Channel Software Operation > Intel Corporation > ph: +1 503 264 4309 > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Lsb-wg mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-wg >-- End of excerpt from McFadden, Gordon