RE: LSB 3.0 test results for Progeny Debian 3.0 PR2
"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D0823A479@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com> |
Stew writes: >> /tset/POSIX.os/files/stat_X/T.stat_X 1 FAIL >> >> Failed to open /dev/sda, perhaps there isn't one (this is >> the answer to an interview question on test setup - the >> name of a block device that can be opened) >> >> It's the value of VSX_BLKDEV_FILE in tetexec.cfg. >> > >Any thought on making /home/tet/test_sets/nonexistb the default device? >I've been using this for some time, since you can't count on having >/dev/sda with devfs/udev, and if it's a real system device, I'm not so >sure we'd want the tests using it anyway. Sounds like a reasonable idea, but we need to run it by the experts. Maybe a bugreport is in order?