RE: 3.0 tests depend on libc >= 2.3.5?

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite
Message-ID <A06801158AE07847B27A52C1A074BC1D08482A01@fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com>
>Hi Andrew,
>
>I think what Jeff is referring to in particular is the fact 
>that the test 
>RPMs have a package dependency on "libc >= 2.3.5" and when 
>alien converts 
>this dependency it can't be fulfilled on Debian 3.1 (sarge) 
>and so can't be 
>installed. I don't know if this dependency is being generated 
>by the rpm 
>build based on the build environment or if it's hard-coded in 
>the rpm spec 
>file.
>
>Would it be acceptable to remove this package dependency to 
>allow runtime implementations not yet using that version of
>the canonical implementation (or using another implementation,
>we don't mandate glibc after all) to be able to install? 
>That seems like the correct thing to do.

I don't see any sign the packages require that:

$ rpm -qp --requires lsb-runtime-test-3.0.0-4.i486.rpm
lsb-tet3-lite
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.