Re: 3.0 tests depend on libc >= 2.3.5?

Mats Wichmann writes...

> I've run into this before. I think it's because alien doesn't
> recognize the package as an LSB package, because it depends
> on stuff provided by an lsb metapackage that's not released.

First off it's not a proper LSB package, even if it does depend on an lsb 
metapackage.
Second, even if it was how is alien supposed to be able to recognize an LSB 
package? We've had this argument before and I proposed setting a field in the 
RPM header, but I don't think it when anywhere.

-- 
Matt Taggart
[email protected]