Re: Proposal for a new runtime test tool
Stuart Anderson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is still just testing the compilation environment, and not directly the
runtime environment.
How wil this tool work? Will it be a repackaged devchk? Are you going to
actually parse the headers and try to make decisions that way? If so,
it's a lot of work for a small gain over devchk. Why not just make
devchk more thorough?
Note that LSB headers are intentionally not neccessarily a proper subset of
the system headers.
After reading the indicated page, it's still not clear what makes this a
runtiem test tool. What coverage is it providing beyond what devchk
either already does or could easily be extended to do?
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
> Hi,
> As we all know LSB runtime test tools today do not have enough
> coverage for all the ABIs specified. The lsblibchk tool does not go
> beyond checking for existence of an interface and the version string if
> applicable.
>
> This new tool proposed here will actually expand the test
> coverage by validating the type definitions (structures etc.), interface
> details at parameter level. It will do so by validating the header file
> used by a distro provider while building the library package.
>
> The details are at: http://www.linuxbase.org/LSBWiki/HeaderCheck
>
> Please read the Wiki and comment.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [email protected]
Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149