Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.
[email protected] Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:00:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.linuxbase.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and
decide on an initial action.
Generally, this means one of three things:
(1) You decide this bug is really quick to deal with (like, it's INVALID),
and so you get rid of it immediately.
(2) You decide the bug doesn't belong to you, and you reassign it to someone
else. (Hint: if you don't know who to reassign it to, make sure that
the Component field seems reasonable, and then use the "Reassign bug to
owner of selected component" option.)
(3) You decide the bug belongs to you, but you can't solve it this moment.
Just use the "Accept bug" command.
To get a list of all NEW bugs, you can use this URL (bookmark it if you
like!):
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&[email protected]
Or, you can use the general query page, at
http://bugs.linuxbase.org/query.cgi.
Appended below are the individual URLs to get to all of your NEW bugs that
haven't been touched for a week or more.
You will get this message once a day until you've dealt with these bugs! startup script tests needed
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
lsb runtime tests should install in /opt/lsb
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39
lsbappchk is not built with lsbcc, so it doesn't look for /lib/ld-lsb.so.1.
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86
-L Library not located
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152
need to handle order of shared libs better
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210
Can tests use mount, umount commands?
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225
Need more regression tests for our test suites
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622
LSB.os/jump/makecontext.1,3 unresolved PR.0067
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675
questionable mprotect test
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684
X11 testsuite needs Xt and extension tests
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704
Build c++ test against upstream source
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708
Build qmtest harness against upstream source
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711
Introduce LSB command tests
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
archk detect non-PIC code
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725
release lsbpkgchk for 2.1
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
need easier way to run appchk w/ shlibs
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786
pkgchk bad depends: messages not very good
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=822
request to rename LI18NUX to i18n
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=833
logic problem in writev test 30
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=844
should pkgchk require specific version only?
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882
pam_open_session 3, pam_close_session 2
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=966
lsb_release is not tested for
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=969
pam account setup uses non-LSB command
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987
libchk not checking dladdr return value
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988
Release lsb-xts5
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=990
appchk new fails on IA64
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1011
LSB 4.0 Runtime Tests release
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
LSB 4.0 Application Checks release
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021
.rodata has SHF_MERGE and SHF_STRINGS flag set; appchk reports error
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031
tjreport network waiver lookup should include journal type
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1042
Default block device for lsb-runtime-test
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1050
Test output from /tset/LSB.os/procprim/exec_L/T.<foo> 7 masks real failure
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1053
/tset/PTHR.os/thread/pthread_join/T.pthread_join and T.pthread_create
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1055
/thread/pthread{1-6}.cc 1 UNREPORTED
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1056
vsw4: CH03/mp* tests unresolved
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1061
T.sigconcept{37} cause T.sigconcept{41} to fail
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065
/tset/LSB.os/jump/makecontext/T.makecontext {1,3} UNRESOLVED
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1067
/tset/LSB.os/mprotect/mprotect_P/T.mprotect_P 8 UNREPORTED
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1068
/21_strings/char_traits/requirements/wchar_t/1.cc 1 FAIL
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1069
libchk / database should have C++ inheritance data
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070
libchk (classchk.c) unable to deal properly with "new" PPC64 ABI
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1079
tet_getvar handling for VSX_AL_ACCURACY can cause T.sleep.1 to fail
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1085
unexpected dependencies show up in output, but no in journal
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1108
pkgchk needs way to allow dependency on ISV provided pkgs
-> http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1109