RE: Proposal for toolset modifications forLSB-Desktoprelease

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:lsb-test-
>
>special case: I'm reluctant to use a command-line option for
>lsbcc as we don't know for sure what the back-end compiler will
>be.  In the case of gcc it doesn't currently appear to use
>the -T option, which is unusually lucky, but you could call
>a different compiler.  So we may want to handle lsbcc differently.
>

We can create a shell variable to specify the product, if it is not
declared then have default behavior, else specify product string to
shell variable.