Re: Proposal for toolset modifications for LSB-Desktoprelease
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:02:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Wichmann, Mats D" writes... > This feels cumbersome, but let's ask a question: > > today, can an ordinary user start lsb-buildenv, or does > that have to be the superuser? > > if the former, it feels reasonable to do sequences like: > > lsb-buildenv --target=desktop start > ... build stuff > lsb-buildenv stop > > but if the latter, I'd expect it to be a boot-time thing > instead, and thus I wouldn't want the option to be a > startup option, but rather a build-time option of some > sort. Even if it's the super-user restarting things I can see it getting started up and shut down on a regular basis (more often than booting). So other questions, * Is it unreasonable to expect the developer to restart the buildenv in order to change the type they are targetting? (I think no, but am not sure) * Will a developer in the buildenv have a need to change the type they are targeting without wanting to restart the buildenv, like within a single build? (I think maybe, imagine a build that produces both lsb-core and lsb-desktop binaries.) I think build-time would be better than env start time, but how would it be implemented? -- Matt Taggart Open Source & Linux Organization R&D [email protected] Hewlett-Packard