Re: Proposal for toolset modifications for LSB-Desktoprelease

Matt Taggart <[email protected]> Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:02:10 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lsb.test-suite
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Wichmann, Mats D" writes...

> This feels cumbersome, but let's ask a question:
> 
> today, can an ordinary user start lsb-buildenv, or does
> that have to be the superuser?
> 
> if the former, it feels reasonable to do sequences like:
> 
> lsb-buildenv --target=desktop start
> ... build stuff
> lsb-buildenv stop
> 
> but if the latter, I'd expect it to be a boot-time thing
> instead, and thus I wouldn't want the option to be a
> startup option, but rather a build-time option of some
> sort.

Even if it's the super-user restarting things I can see it getting started 
up and shut down on a regular basis (more often than booting). So other 
questions,

* Is it unreasonable to expect the developer to restart the buildenv in 
order to change the type they are targetting? (I think no, but am not sure)

* Will a developer in the buildenv have a need to change the type they are 
targeting without wanting to restart the buildenv, like within a single 
build? (I think maybe, imagine a build that produces both lsb-core and 
lsb-desktop binaries.)

I think build-time would be better than env start time, but how would it be 
implemented?

-- 
Matt Taggart        Open Source & Linux Organization R&D
[email protected]   Hewlett-Packard