RE: RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal

Initial e-mail didn't show up on the mailing list... can someone post it
again to the mailing list.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:lsb-test-
>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harring, BrianX D
>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:32 PM
>To: Wichmann, Mats D; [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: [Lsb-test] RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wichmann, Mats D
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:47 PM
>> To: Harring, BrianX D; '[email protected]'
>> Cc: '[email protected]'; Banginwar, Rajesh; Gupta, Rita
>> Subject: RE: Initial patch for toolset modification proposal
>>
>> Initial reaction is to repeat something that was said last
>> week, I forget in what forum: "target" kind of already
>> has the context of "target processor architecture" so it
>> might be better to pick a different term.
>
>If the autoconfig usage of --target for cross compilation is enough of
>an issue, I'd suggest --lsb-target offhand, although --product or
>--lsb-product are quick alternatives that might be a bit more apt.
>
>Any preference for alternatives above?
>~brian
>_______________________________________________
>lsb-test mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test