[Bug 1150] pamh = NULL tests not in spec

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]




------- Additional Comments From [email protected]  2006-01-18 03:56 -------
This was found by a broken Linux-PAM release and fixed in the next Linux-PAM
release. So current Linux-PAM does not crash anymore. But this brought up the
question if this is specified or if we test something unspecified.

I think possible solutions would be to document the behavior or remove the test
cases. The implementations I'm aware of return all PAM_SYSTEM_ERR if pamh is
NULL, maybe we should add it to the PAM spec?

Jiri, do you have still the journals with the Fails?   
 
--    
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.linuxbase.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email   
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.