Re: [PATCH] rfim: add new test for verifying RFIM sysfs interface
Andrea Cervesato via ltp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ltp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> This depends on where the error from kernel is supposed to be returned > from. For files that are generated by kernel such as /sys/ and /proc/ > the permission bits can be all enabled but you may still get EPERM when > you actually open the file and kernel decides that this file shouldn't > be readable in the open() syscall handler for the particular file. Thanks for pointing out. So I guess open() is ok, we can proceed with the initial approach. Regards, -- Andrea Cervesato SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux andrea.cervesato-IBi9RG/[email protected] -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp