Re: [PATCH] syscall02: add invalid syscall number test

Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ltp
Message-ID <20260630164046.GA474697@pevik>
Hi Andrea,

> Hi Petr,

> > > I suggest add two more cases check:
> > > 1) -1
> > > 2) __NR_syscalls +1 (Base arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c)


> that was my initial idea, but different architectures are starting
> from a different value and I wanted to make it generic. I guess
> the right way would be to include syscalls.h and use
> __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL at this point. WDYT?

Yes, __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL is better than -1 (for all archs we have
#define __LTP__NR_INVALID_SYSCALL -1)

But I'd also use __NR_syscalls from <asm-generic/unistd.h> (the second suggested
case), i.e. have arch dependent value based on UAPI headers.

Also, you could add a real description to the values to .desc.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.