Re: [PATCH] memcg_stress: survive OOM by targeting the stressors

Li Wang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ltp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Andrea,

Andrea Cervesato wrote:

> From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato-IBi9RG/[email protected]>
> 
> The single-cgroup subtest intentionally lets one process fault in the
> whole memory budget to push the system to its memory ceiling, so hitting
> the OOM killer is an expected part of the stress. The problem is that the
> OOM killer could reap the driver script, turning that expected pressure
> into a spurious TBROK.
> 
> Mark the stress processes as the preferred OOM victims. A killed stressor
> is already reaped and cleaned up by the test, while the driver survives
> and reports the result.
> 
> Fixes: 02961a7b2bb4 ("memcg_stress_test.sh: Fix reserved mem calculate")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato-IBi9RG/[email protected]>
> ---
> On some systems this might happens:
> 
> [  244.207623][T117130] kirk[3061]: memcg_stress: start (command: memcg_stress_test.sh)
> [  244.391438][T117164] memcg_stress_te (117164): drop_caches: 3
> [ 1444.509722][T119900] kirk[3061]: memcg_stress: end (returncode: -1)
> [ 1444.629434][T119934] kirk[3061]: memcg_control: start (command: memcg_control_test.sh)
> [ 1445.856012][T120020] mem_process invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xcc0(GFP_KERNEL), order=0, oom_score_adj=0

I agree with the underlying goal, keep the driver alive and let the
stressors absorb the OOM pressure, but I'd like to suggest a different
way that mirrors what we already do in the C harness, and that fixes
this at the lib level rather than in the individual test.

In lib/tst_test.c we don't raise the score of the stress/test processes.
Instead we protect the harness and then explicitly drop that protection
in the child before it runs the actual test:

$ grep -A 8 -B 9 tst_enable_oom_protection lib/tst_test.c

void tst_run_tcases(int argc, char *argv[], struct tst_test *self)
{
	unsigned int test_variants = 1;
	struct utsname uval;

	tst_test = self;

	do_setup(argc, argv);
	tst_enable_oom_protection(context->lib_pid);

	SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGALRM, alarm_handler);
	SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR1, heartbeat_handler);

	tst_res(TINFO, "LTP version: "LTP_VERSION);

	uname(&uval);
	tst_res(TINFO, "Tested kernel: %s %s %s", uval.release, uval.version, uval.machine);

$ grep -A 8 -B 9 tst_disable_oom_protection lib/tst_test.c
	alarm(context->overall_time);

	show_failure_hints = 1;

	test_pid = fork();
	if (test_pid < 0)
		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "fork()");

	if (!test_pid) {
		tst_disable_oom_protection(0);
		SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGALRM, SIG_DFL);
		SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR1, SIG_DFL);
		SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGTERM, SIG_DFL);
		SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
		SAFE_SETPGID(0, 0);
		testrun();
	}

The important detail is that oom_score_adj is inherited across fork.
So the model is: the library process sets itself to -1000, and child
resets itself back to 0 before doing any real work. The harness survives,
the workload stays a normal OOM candidate.

What do you think about doing this in the shell lib so all shell
tests benefit, rather than only memcg_stress?

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.