Re: [PATCH v1] pipe13: Scale child reap window with LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL

Andrea Cervesato via ltp <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ltp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Stephen,

> The post-close wait used a fixed 1000000 us cap on exponential backoff
> (~524 ms total). Scale that cap with tst_multiply_timeout() so debug
> kernels and LTP_TIMEOUT_MUL apply, fixing failures under parallel
> Kirk workers without changing default behavior on non-debug systems.
> 
> Before (only with case 100):
> 
> pipe13.c:50: TINFO: Creating 100 child processes
> pipe13.c:81: TINFO: pid 435007 still sleeps
> ...
> pipe13.c:81: TINFO: pid 435300 still sleeps
> pipe13.c:89: TFAIL: Closed pipe didn't wake up everyone
> The list varied but sometimes up to 20 would remained asleep.
> 
> After using tst_multiply_timeout(), test passes.
> 
> The failure before would happen, when using 4 paralell workers
> on a debug kernel, about 1 to 2 times when iterated 5 times.
> With the addition of the function, under the same conditions,
> it has not failed in 100 iterations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Bertram <[email protected]>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe13.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe13.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe13.c
> index 5d76e1f00..cf1ccbcbc 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe13.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pipe/pipe13.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static void verify_pipe(unsigned int n)
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned int i, cnt = 0, sleep_us = 1, fail = 0;
>  	unsigned int child_num = tcases[n];
> +	unsigned int sleep_us_cap = tst_multiply_timeout(1000) * 1000U;

Even better: we can create a function to reap children and verify
if they are completed while counting them.
Then we can use TST_RETRY_FN_EXP_BACKOFF() on it.

The problem is that we are waiting a fixed amount of time (~1s) that
is not enough when system is overloaded.

Most likely, when you are calling kirk parallel execution, other tests
are overloading the system and this test fails accordingly.

Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato-IBi9RG/[email protected]

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.