Re: [PATCH v2] syscall02: test invalid syscall number -1

Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ltp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi!
> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
> index a021c79da49d4157c33187caed2dd3f0483759e0..8a777e61da1af59ba694e0bc5b5d92bb1d63754a 100644
> --- a/runtest/syscalls
> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
> @@ -1678,6 +1678,7 @@ sync_file_range01 sync_file_range01
>  sync_file_range02 sync_file_range02
>  
>  syscall01 syscall01
> +syscall02 syscall02
>  
>  sysconf01 sysconf01
>  
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/.gitignore
> index 74a081e40cb564e874e0f81478d3d1a0e95b6df4..fed1d81079450a7442023447285cd112924f7a10 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/.gitignore
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>  /syscall01
> +/syscall02
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/syscall02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/syscall02.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fefcb17c763813653a6644759c2a035bee2c604
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/syscall/syscall02.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2026 SUSE LLC Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato-IBi9RG/[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Verify that a raw :manpage:`syscall(2)` with the invalid system call
> + * number -1 fails with ENOSYS.
> + *
> + * The behavior of number -1 is architecture specific, so the test only runs on
> + * the architectures where it has been verified against the kernel entry code.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> +	TST_EXP_FAIL2(syscall(-1), ENOSYS, "invalid syscall number -1");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> +	.test_all = run,
> +	.supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
> +		"x86_64",
> +		"aarch64",
> +		NULL
> +	},
> +};

I do not think that there is an architecture that has a valid syscall
mapped to -1. I do not think that we need to restrict the architecture
here.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.