Re: [PATCH v2 12/31] testcases: sysfs: Add sys_ata01

Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ltp
Message-ID <20260820155757.GB495062@pevik>
Hi Cyril,

> A test for /sys/class/ata_device/*/* files.

Lol, on one of my system I don't have /sys/class/ata_device/,
but I have /sys/class/scsi_device/ directory. I suppose SCSI is still used but
obsolete right? Or would it be worth to test it as well?
...
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/sysfs/class/ata_device/sys_ata01.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2026 Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Sanity checks for the ATA device attributes exported under
> + * /sys/class/ata_device/<dev>/.
> + *
> + * For every ATA device the test verifies that:
> + *
> + * - class is one of the known libata device classes (ata, atapi, pmp, semb,
> + *   unknown)
> + * - dma_mode, pio_mode and xfer_mode, when non-empty, start with the "XFER_"

Please, before merge change to:
- * - dma_mode, pio_mode and xfer_mode, when non-empty, start with the "XFER_"
+ * - dma_mode, pio_mode and xfer_mode, when non-empty, start with the ``XFER_``

otherwise sphinx complains:
_static/tests.rst:45958: ERROR: Unknown target name: "xfer". [docutils]

Otherwise LGTM, nice test, great patchset.

Only to this particular patch:

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>

I try to have look on the whole patchset tomorrow.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.