Re: Thin pool performance when allocating lots of blocks
Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general,gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dne 08. 02. 22 v 22:02 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): > On 2/8/22 15:37, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: >> Dne 08. 02. 22 v 20:00 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): >>> Are thin volumes (which start as snapshots of a blank volume) efficient >>> for building virtual machine images? Given the nature of this workload >>> (writing to lots of new, possibly-small files, then copying data from >>> them to a huge disk image), I expect that this will cause sharing to be >>> broken many, many times, and the kernel code that breaks sharing appears >>> to be rather heavyweight. Furthermore, since zeroing is enabled, this >>> might cause substantial write amplification. Turning zeroing off is not >>> an option for security reasons. >>> >>> Is there a way to determine if breaking sharing is the cause of >>> performance problems? If it is, are there any better solutions? >> >> Hi >> >> Usually the smaller the thin chunks size is the smaller the problem gets. >> With current released version of thin-provisioning minimal chunk size is >> 64KiB. So you can't use smaller value to further reduce this impact. >> >> Note - even if you do a lot of tiny 4KiB writes - only the 'first' such write >> into 64K area breaks sharing all following writes to same location no longer >> have this penalty (also zeroing with 64K is less impactful...) >> >> But it's clear thin-provisioning comes with some price - so if it's not good >> enough from time constrains some other solutions might need to be explored. >> (i.e. caching, better hw, splitting FS into multiple partitions with >> 'read-only sections,....) > > Are the code paths that break sharing as heavyweight as I was worried > about? Would a hypothetical dm-thin2 that used dm-bio-prison-v2 be > faster? > Biggest problem is the size of chunks - the smaller chunk you could use, the less amplification you get. On the other hand the amount of metadata handling is increasing. Then there is a lot about parallelization, locking and disk synchronization. If you are more interested in this topic, dive into kernel code. Also I'd suggest to make some good benchmarking. Regards Zdenek _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/