Re: vgcreate doesn't work with lvmlockd running
Zhiyong Ye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi David, Thanks for your reply and detailed answer. It is true that It works fine with the latest version of lvm as you said. Thanks again! Zhiyong 在 5/5/22 10:07 PM, David Teigland 写道: > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:08:36PM +0800, Zhiyong Ye wrote: >> root@n151-143-035:~# lvmlockd -V >> lvmlockd version: 2.03.02(2) (2018-12-18) >> root@n151-143-035:~# sanlock -V >> sanlock 3.6.0 (built Jul 11 2018 12:44:29) > >> It is mentioned in the main page under "creating the first sanlock VG" >> that the first VG is created to get the global lock, so I create the VG >> directly: >> >> root@n151-143-035:~# vgcreate --lock-type sanlock --shared test >> /dev/mapper/mpatha1 --verbose > > This is correct. > >> Enabling sanlock global lock >> Wiping signatures on new PV /dev/mapper/mpatha1. >> Set up physical volume for "/dev/mapper/mpatha1" with 2147483648 >> available sectors. >> Zeroing start of device /dev/mapper/mpatha1. >> Writing physical volume data to disk "/dev/mapper/mpatha1". >> Physical volume "/dev/mapper/mpatha1" successfully created. >> Adding physical volume '/dev/mapper/mpatha1' to volume group 'test' >> Archiving volume group "test" metadata (seqno 0). >> Creating logical volume lvmlock >> Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/test" (seqno 2). >> Activating logical volume test/lvmlock. >> activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking only >> host tags for test/lvmlock. >> Creating test-lvmlock >> Loading table for test-lvmlock (254:1). >> Resuming test-lvmlock (254:1). >> /dev/test/lvmlock: not found: device not cleared >> Aborting. Failed to wipe start of new LV. > > This looks like a bug, and it does look familiar. I'd guess that section > of code is missing a call to synchronize with udev (sync_local_dev_names). > Unfortunately your version of lvm (and sanlock) are old enough that it's > hard to say immediately if it's fixed. The best option would be trying > newer versions where it's most likely been fixed. > > Dave > _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/