Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor

Zhiyong Ye <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lvm.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Gionatan,

Thanks for your reply and detailed answer.

I actually use iSCSI for my underlying storage and the bare disk random 
write iops is 65543. Some of the parameters of my iSCSI initiator are as 
follows:
node.session.iscsi.FirstBurstLength = 524288
node.session.iscsi.MaxBurstLength = 33552384
node.session.cmds_max = 4096
node.session.queue_depth = 1024

After creating the PV and VG based on the iSCSI device, I created the 
thin pool as follows:
lvcreate -n pool -L 1000G test-vg
lvcreate -n poolmeta -L 100G test-vg
lvconvert --type thin-pool --chunksize 64k --poolmetadata 
test-vg/poolmeta test-vg/pool
lvchange -Z n test-vg/pool

Then I create thin lv in the thin pool:
lvcreate -n test-thin -V 500G --thinpool pool test-vg

And my command for creating snapshots:
lvcreate -n test-thin1s1 -s test-vg/test-thin

I have the following fio parameter and use it for all tests:
[global]
bs=4k
direct=1
iodepth=32
numjobs=8
ioengine=libaio
group_reporting
runtime=120
time_based
filename=/dev/vdb

[rand-write]
name=rand-write
rw=randwrite
stonewall

Thanks again!

Zhiyong Ye

在 6/14/22 3:04 PM, Gionatan Danti 写道:
> Il 2022-06-13 10:49 Zhiyong Ye ha scritto:
>> The performance degradation after snapshotting is expected as writing
>> to a snapshotted lv involving reading the original data, writing it
>> elsewhere and then writing new data into the original chunk. But the
>> performance loss was so much more than I expected. Is there any way to
>> improve performance after creating a snapshot? Can I ask for your
>> help?
> 
> This is the key point: when first writing to a new chunk, not only it 
> needs to be allocated, but old data must be copied. This r/m/w operation 
> transform an async operation (write) on a sync one (read), ruining 
> performance. Subsequent writes to the same chunk does have the same issue.
> 
> The magnitute of the slowdown seems somewhat excessive, though. When 
> dealing with HDD pools, I remember a 3-5x impact on IOPs. Can you show 
> the exact fio command and the parameters of your thin pool (ie: chunk 
> size) and storage subsystem (HDD vs SSD, SATA vs SAS vs NVME)?
> 
> Regards.
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.