Re: Why is the performance of my lvmthin snapshot so poor
Zhiyong Ye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Gionatan, Thanks for your reply and detailed answer. I actually use iSCSI for my underlying storage and the bare disk random write iops is 65543. Some of the parameters of my iSCSI initiator are as follows: node.session.iscsi.FirstBurstLength = 524288 node.session.iscsi.MaxBurstLength = 33552384 node.session.cmds_max = 4096 node.session.queue_depth = 1024 After creating the PV and VG based on the iSCSI device, I created the thin pool as follows: lvcreate -n pool -L 1000G test-vg lvcreate -n poolmeta -L 100G test-vg lvconvert --type thin-pool --chunksize 64k --poolmetadata test-vg/poolmeta test-vg/pool lvchange -Z n test-vg/pool Then I create thin lv in the thin pool: lvcreate -n test-thin -V 500G --thinpool pool test-vg And my command for creating snapshots: lvcreate -n test-thin1s1 -s test-vg/test-thin I have the following fio parameter and use it for all tests: [global] bs=4k direct=1 iodepth=32 numjobs=8 ioengine=libaio group_reporting runtime=120 time_based filename=/dev/vdb [rand-write] name=rand-write rw=randwrite stonewall Thanks again! Zhiyong Ye 在 6/14/22 3:04 PM, Gionatan Danti 写道: > Il 2022-06-13 10:49 Zhiyong Ye ha scritto: >> The performance degradation after snapshotting is expected as writing >> to a snapshotted lv involving reading the original data, writing it >> elsewhere and then writing new data into the original chunk. But the >> performance loss was so much more than I expected. Is there any way to >> improve performance after creating a snapshot? Can I ask for your >> help? > > This is the key point: when first writing to a new chunk, not only it > needs to be allocated, but old data must be copied. This r/m/w operation > transform an async operation (write) on a sync one (read), ruining > performance. Subsequent writes to the same chunk does have the same issue. > > The magnitute of the slowdown seems somewhat excessive, though. When > dealing with HDD pools, I remember a 3-5x impact on IOPs. Can you show > the exact fio command and the parameters of your thin pool (ie: chunk > size) and storage subsystem (HDD vs SSD, SATA vs SAS vs NVME)? > > Regards. > _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/